Love your pictures by the way, beautiful!

To Tim I would ask, where is the proof? If your way of thinking is indeed so obvious and provable, and I am so ignorant, where is the mountain of evidence to prove evolution? The truth is it isn’t there. We have never seen one example of species “transforming”. The best evolution can point to, like black peppered moths during the industrial revolution or the finches of the Galapagos Islands or supposedly evolving super-germs, are all very explainable to even the dimmest of minds, and do not in any way show one species evolving to another. Further consider, as Jennifer pointed out, that we have no fossil records to back up this supposed phenomena. If billions and billions of years of time and random genetic defects on the order of millions of bad to even one good is the engine that fueled our existence, then we should have literally billions of skeletal remains for each and every species we evolved from. But they are not there. A bunch of crappy anthropological guess work exist in our museums, which evolutionists like to take a bunch of pretty pictures of and point to as “proof” but they have time and time again been shown as either hoaxes or incorrect, usually constructed from little more than a bone or two and often found in differing locations.

The truth is that evolution has to evolve its own theory in order to keep from being embarrassed. Creationists simply do not see the evidence of how things came into being on their own. Creationists believe that something bigger than ourselves could have had something to do with our existence. Physicists today recognize the mathematical improbability of nothing being able to create everything. Just simple questions like, “where did matter come from?” or “how did energy become?” or “how could an asexual organism reproduce while evolving into a sexual organism?” are all complex questions that deserve consideration beyond just telling anyone who doesn’t agree with you to “shut up and just believe this theory - it is absolute truth!”

Be offended, be appalled, be dumbfounded to know that others do not agree with your supreme academic superiority. But also know that there is a sea of intelligent humans on this planet that have college educations, masters degrees and doctoral degrees who have been through the depths of evolutionary indoctrination and still do not believe. The emperor has no clothes and we’re not afraid to say so.

Beyond that, I wonder how many people who vehemently oppose Creationism have EVER read, with an OPEN mind, about the scientific basis of this teaching? As for me, and the vast majority of everyone out there, I’ve been educated in the public schools from Kindergarten through my Master’s degree, and have been well indoctrinated in evolution. And of course, I read on my own about Creationism. So, I am actually in a much better position to offer an opinion than someone who probably just hates G*d and Christianity, has never done serious study of the science (not just the theology) of Creationism/Intelligent Design, and only is informed on the Theory of Evolution. Very one-sided, which is what propaganda is, and certainly not in the “critical thinking” category. Why on earth would people feel so threatened at having an alternative provided to evolution? I think it’s because in the end, when it becomes clear that there MUST be a Creator who designed this incredible, complex, highly ordered universe, that people are forced to face the Creator. Ahh, accountability, subjection to a Higher Being, one Truth, …

He was not teaching ‘Critical Thinking’ so much as ‘Critical Unthinking’ — unthinking acceptance of AiG’s ignorance and dishonesty.

“But here we are, just 80 some years later, and those same teachers are prohibited from teaching anything but that man was descended from a lower order of animals.”

This is because this is a scientific fact (part of the ‘facts of evolution’ that are explained by the Theory of Evolution). Teaching anything else would be teaching a scientific fiction.